|
|
Additional
Information: 1. 2. 3. With regard to #2, above, New Hampshire’s lowest-funded school districts provided students more than twice the public funding for education in 2003-2004 than the state provided for students in state-authorized chartered schools in 2005-2006 (2 years later). 4. Another way of comparing equitable public funding: students in state-authorized charter schools receive 15-20% afforded students in wealthier school districts, even when using expenditure data from two years ago. 5. With only $3500 as state funding, charter schools still must cover non-operational costs that are excluded from per pupil calculations of districts. Statewide average facility and transportation costs per student, for example, were $1645 in 2004-2005. Most statewide charter schools apply $1000-$1600 per student toward facility expenses. Charter schools can also have expenditures for transportation, community service programs, tuitions for internet-based courses, non-facility capital items, and interest on loans. Thus, the average non-operational cost for charter schools is probably similar to other public schools, e.g. $2,000 per student. Deducting non-operational costs from the $3500 base state aid, students in state-authorized charter schools, where space is rented, have only $1500 or less per student to provide for each student's education. Deducting non-operational costs from the state aid of $3500, charter school students in 2005-2006 are allotted 1/4th the per student operational funding of students in New Hampshire’s poorest school districts. 6. New Hampshire charter schools were intended to be efficient--to produce more for less. The 1995 statute gives 80% as the amount locally-authorized chartered school students will receive from their home districts--a 20% reduction of district per pupil expenditure. The 1995 charter school funding policy of 80% of funding is workable for most charter schools. For state-authorized schools, perhaps 70% of average costs could be workable. 7. State funding policy should acknowledge that certain populations of students cost more than state average, e.g. deaf students and so the 20%-30% reduction would result in a different amount per student. 8. Most states have a policy of equity in public school funding, assuring that public students receive relatively equitable funding regardless of what public school they attend. 9. Nationwide, based on available reports, 65% of average student funding is the lowest percentage for a state charter school funding policy. 10. If New Hampshire set its charter
school funding policy for state-authorized schools at 65% of the
total state average cost, New Hampshire would still only tie for
last place for equity of charter student funding nationwide. But
even at 65%, our state-authorized charter schools would have a
good chance of sustainability, which is what the funding policy
should strive to achieve. Telephone: Postal Address: |